Skip to main content
Top
Cookie Notification
Cookie Notification

We use cookies to collect information about how our website is used and to improve the visitor experience. You can change your browser’s cookie settings at any time. Please review our privacy policy for more information. OK

  • Careers
  • Salary Surveys
  • Login
  • Blog

Menu

  • Why Pearl Meyer
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our Approach
    • Our Commitment
    • Our Clients
    • Our Role
  • Advisory Services
    • Consulting Services
      • Executive Compensation
      • Director Compensation
      • Employee Compensation
      • Compensation Communication
      • Leadership Development
      • CEO and Executive Succession
      • Compensation Governance
    • Specialized Expertise
      • By Industry
      • High-growth Start-Ups
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Restructuring
    • Salary Surveys
      • Running Your Salary Survey
      • Salary Survey Portfolio
      • By Industry
  • Meet our Team
  • Knowledge Share
  • Contact Us
  • Why Pearl Meyer
    • Our Philosophy
    • Our Approach
    • Our Commitment
    • Our Clients
    • Our Role
  • Advisory Services
    • Consulting Services
      • Executive Compensation
      • Director Compensation
      • Employee Compensation
      • Compensation Communication
      • Leadership Development
      • CEO and Executive Succession
      • Compensation Governance
    • Specialized Expertise
      • By Industry
      • High-growth Start-Ups
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Restructuring
    • Salary Surveys
      • Running Your Salary Survey
      • Salary Survey Portfolio
      • By Industry
  • Meet our Team
  • Knowledge Share
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Salary Surveys
  • Login
  • Blog
You are here
  • Home
  • Knowledge Share
  • Non-GAAP Measures in Executive Compensation

Non-GAAP Measures in Executive Compensation

Ask the Expert Interview
December 2017

Matt Turner, managing director in the Chicago office of Pearl Meyer, discusses several points that companies can weigh when determining when and how to use GAAP versus non-GAAP measures to determine performance.

Q. Do most companies use GAAP or non-GAAP earnings when looking at performance for pay purposes?

A: In my experience there is a mix of practices. Some companies rely solely on GAAP measures of profit, growth, and returns, but it is also quite common to find non-GAAP measures used. In any event, it’s important to note that a majority of companies also use non-financial measures to determine at least a portion of incentive compensation. So most companies rely on at least some non-GAAP performance measurement for incentives.

Q. What are the pros and cons of using non-GAAP versus GAAP when determining executive pay?

A: GAAP, of course, provides a common standard that is well-understood by the business community. In general, GAAP measures provide a fair and accurate picture of firm performance. When looking at performance across a large number of companies, a standard measure is required. But for a particular company, or even industry, there are times when adjustments provide a better picture of core performance, or provide better signals and/or incentives within an organization.

For example, an earnings measure adjusted for cash versus accrued taxes (and/or other accrual to cash adjustments) might better reflect long-term performance for some businesses. Another example, fairly common, is looking at a return measure, like ROIC, with significant new investments or acquisitions suspended from the calculation until the following year. The idea is to avoid discouraging long-term investment, or “punishing” management for the right decisions. (Significant new investments typically drive down short-term ROIC because “invested capital” increases before the new investments can produce “return.”) Finally, there are times when a firm may want to focus on the components earnings that are most under the control or influence of management, so non-operating earnings/expenses might be excluded.

There are two things to keep in mind here. First, performance measures used in incentive compensation plans are not intended to simply and mechanically communicate overall firm performance. Yes, we want strong correlation between incentive plan results and firm performance, and we absolutely want pay and performance aligned. But plans will be most effective as a tool of strategy execution if they recognize how management will respond to them.

Second, keep in mind that senior executives’ pay is not tied solely to financial results. Share price (through stock options, restricted stock, and performance shares) is often the largest influence on variable pay. This is especially true for larger companies. For the sake of balancing “alignment” (pay tied to share price) and “line-of-sight” (pay tied more closely to decision-making), it often makes sense to have cash incentive tied to the latter objective.

Q. What should compensation committees keep in mind when looking at non-GAAP figures for pay purposes?

A: In one sense, compensation committees have the same set of concerns with non-GAAP measures that they do with GAAP measures. First, measures should have a demonstrable link to share price performance over the long-term and be relevant to the business strategy and economic context. Second, performance goals should be set specific to the company and its circumstances. It is not sufficient to say target performance is median of a peer group, or X% above last year’s performance. Shareholders may actually expect more (or less) than what they expect from other comparable companies.

But with non-GAAP measures, comp committees need to ensure that any adjustments are justified by the economics, are applied consistently over time (the measure cannot change every year), and that the rationale for the measure and adjustments are well-explained/disclosed to shareholders in the proxy.

This last point is an area where companies can and must do a better job.

Download(s)

Ask the Expert Interview

Author(s)

Matt Turner Headshot
Managing Director
Chicago

Matt Turner

(312) 242-3051

Contact
Get to Know Matt
Stay Connected: twitter linkedin youtube
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • News & Events

Copyright © 2023 Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy