We use cookies to collect information about how our website is used and to improve the visitor experience. You can change your browser’s cookie settings at any time. Please review our privacy policy for more information. OK
August 8, 2019
2:00pm ET
Recent research shows that due to the structure of the models and evaluation approaches used by proxy advisors to determine support of say-on-pay proposals, a surprising number of public companies will eventually receive an “Against” vote recommendation. While management and boards are loath to receive a negative outcome, this finding is a potentially important frame of reference to evaluate your own company’s overall standing with and approach to ISS and Glass Lewis.
Join Pearl Meyer and the NACD for an in-depth discussion on ways in which proxy advisors have shaped the executive pay model, for better and for worse. We will outline:
Speakers:
Terry Newth is a managing director in Pearl Meyer’s Boston office. He consults on the design, development, and assessment of executive compensation programs that support each organization’s business objectives, long term business strategy, and culture. His clients range from Fortune 500 organizations to pre-IPOs to private and family-owned companies in a wide range of industries.
Rainer Gawlick is a director with Protolabs, where he is a member of the audit committee and chair of the compensation committee. He is also on the boards of Progress, Meltwater, ChyronHego, and SingleDigits. For each company, Dr. Gawlick is either a member or the chair of the compensation committee. Dr. Gawlick has held executive sales and marketing positions at a broad range of technology companies and served as a consultant with McKinsey & Company, advising clients in the electronics, telecommunications, and biotechnology and software sectors.